Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Show filter

All Advisory Opinions

Filter by

Showing 421–433 of 433 advisory opinions
Sorted by most recent
  • AO 98-08

    Whether Company A ("Company A"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company B ("Company B") (collectively referred to as "Company AB") would be subject to exclusion from Federal health care programs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(b).

    Posted July 6, 1998
  • AO 98-07

    Whether an ambulance restocking and continuing education arrangement (the "Arrangement") constitutes prohibited remuneration under the anti-kickback statute, section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act (the "Act")".

    Posted June 11, 1998
  • AO 98-06

    Whether waiving coinsurance obligations for participants in a clinical study sponsored by the Health Care Financing Administration and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (the "Proposed Arrangement").

    Posted April 24, 1998
  • AO 98-03

    Whether a hospital system's provision of an ambulance to a municipal fire department as described in your request.

    Posted April 14, 1998
  • AO 98-04

    Whether a proposed management services contract between a medical practice management company and a physician practice, which provides that the management company will be reimbursed for its costs and paid a percentage of net practice revenues.

    Posted April 14, 1998
  • AO 98-02

    Certain pharmaceutical discount pricing arrangements that are limited to arrangements between a manufacturer and wholesalers (the "Proposed Arrangement") will subject you to sanction under the anti-kickback statute.

    Posted April 8, 1998
  • AO 98-01

    Whether a contractual arrangement for distribution and billing services between Company A and Company B (the ""Arrangement"") constitutes grounds for sanction under the anti-kickback statute.

    Posted March 19, 1998
  • AO 97-06

    Asks whether a proposed arrangement for restocking ambulance supplies and medications (the "Proposed Arrangement") would constitute illegal remuneration as defined in the anti-kickback statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b).

    Posted October 20, 1997
  • AO 97-05

    Asks whether an outpatient radiology imaging center joint venture owned by a medical group specializing in radiology and a hospital care provider (i) generates prohibited remuneration within the meaning of the anti-kickback statute, Section 1128B of the Social Security Act ("Act"); (ii) constitutes grounds for the imposition of an exclusion under Section 1128(b)(7) of the Act (as it applies to kickbacks); (iii) constitutes grounds for criminal sanctions under Section 1128B(b) of the Act; and/or (iv) satisfies the criteria set out in Section 1128B(b)(3) of the Act or associated regulations, 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952.

    Posted October 15, 1997
  • AO 97-04

    Asks whether declining to pursue collection of copayments from certain patients who have employer-sponsored Medicare complementary coverage constitutes grounds for imposition of sanctions under Section 231(h) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") [42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a(a)(5)] or under Sections 1128B(b) (the anti-kickback statute) or 1128A(7) (relating to payment of kickbacks) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. §§ 1320a-7b(b) and 1320a-7(b)(7)].

    Posted October 2, 1997
  • AO 97-03

    Asks whether Mrs. P's transfer of assets to her nephew, Mr. S, and subsequent application for Medicaid benefits, subjects her to sanction under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(a)(6), which prohibits certain dispositions of assets for the purpose of qualifying for Medicaid.

    Posted August 22, 1997
  • AO 97-02

    Asks whether a state-funded program that pays for insurance premiums for financially needy Medicare beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease would constitute grounds for the imposition of a civil monetary penalty under Section 231(h) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

    Posted July 28, 1997
  • AO 97-01

    It is permissible for a charitable organization partly funded by kidney dialysis providers to pay Medicare Part B, Medigap and other health insurance premiums for end-stage renal disease patients who are financially needy.

    Posted June 11, 1997