Office of Audit Services Opioid Reviews

You are viewing the text-based version of this report series. View this series on a map.

Alabama

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

California

• California Improperly Claimed at Least $23 Million of $260 Million in Total Medicaid Reimbursement for Opioid Treatment Program Services (A-09-20-02009)
• California Claimed at Least $2 Million in Unallowable Medicaid Reimbursement for a Selected Provider's Opioid Treatment Program Services A-09-20-02001
• California Made Progress Toward Achieving Program Goals for Enhancing Its Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (A-09-18-01006)

Colorado

• About Seventy-Nine Percent of Opioid Treatment Program Services Provided to Medicaid Beneficiaries in Colorado Did Not Meet Federal and State Requirements (A-07-20-04118)

Florida

• Florida Did Not Ensure That Some Providers Complied With Requirements For Determining Eligibility For Its Projects for Assistance in Transition From Homelessness Program (A-02-21-02008)

Kentucky

• The University of Kentucky Made Progress Toward Achieving Program Goals for Enhancing Its Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (A-04-18-02012)
• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Louisiana

• Louisiana Faced Compliance and Contracting Challenges in Implementing Opioid Response Grant Programs (A-06-20-07003)

Nebraska

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Nevada

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

New Hampshire

• More Than 90 Percent of the New Hampshire Managed Care Organization and Fee-for-Service Claims for Opioid Treatment Program Services Did Not Comply With Medicaid Requirements (A-01-20-00006)
• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

New Jersey

• New Jersey Complied With Federal Regulations When Implementing Programs Under SAMHSA’s Opioid Response Grants, But Did Not Meet Its Program Services Goals (A-02-22-02002)

New York

• New York Provided Projects for Assistance in Transition From Homelessness Grant Services to Ineligible Individuals and Did Not Contribute Any Required Non-Federal Funds (A-02-19-02006)
• New York Claimed Tens of Millions of Dollars for Opioid Treatment Program Services That Did Not Comply With Medicaid Requirements Intended To Ensure the Quality of Care Provided to Beneficiaries (A-02-17-01021)
• New York Achieved Program Goals For Enhancing Its Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (A-02-18-02001)

Oklahoma

• Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Made Progress Toward Meeting Program Goals During the First Year of Its Tribal Opioid Response Grant (A-07-20-04121)
• Oklahoma's Oversight of Medicaid Outpatient Services for Opioid Use Disorder Was Generally Effective (A-06-20-08000)

Ohio

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights
• Ohio Made Progress Toward Achieving Program Goals for Enhancing Its Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (A-05-18-00004)

Tennessee

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Texas

• Texas Did Not Ensure Documentation Supported That Individuals Met Eligibility Requirements and That Its Annual Report Was Accurate Under Its Projects for Assistance in Transition From Homelessness Program (A-02-21-02001)
• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Utah

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Washington

• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights
• Washington State Made Progress Toward Achieving Program Goals for Enhancing Its Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (A-09-18-01001)

West Virginia

• West Virginia Lacked Effective Oversight of Its Opioid Response Grants (A-06-22-01005)
• Factsheet
• One-Page Highlights

Vermont

• Vermont Complied With Regulations When Implementing Programs Under SAMHSA's Opioid Response Grants, but Claimed Unallowable Expenditures (A-01-20-01501)