Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Inspector General -- AUDIT
"Review of Medicaid Eligibility in New York State," (A-02-05-01028)
October 10, 2006
Complete Text of Report is available in PDF format (1.6 mb). Copies can also be obtained by contacting the Office of Public Affairs at 202-619-1343.
Our objective was to determine the extent to which the State agency made Medicaid payments on behalf of beneficiaries who did not meet Federal and State eligibility requirements. The State agency (1) made some Medicaid payments on behalf of beneficiaries who did not meet Federal and State eligibility requirements and (2) did not always adequately document eligibility determinations. Of the 200 payments in our statistical sample, 16 payments totaling $874 (Federal share) were unallowable because the beneficiaries were ineligible for Medicaid. In addition, for 58 sampled payments totaling $10,699 (Federal share), the case files did not contain all documentation supporting eligibility determinations as required. As a result, for the 6-month audit period from January 1 through June 30, 2005, we estimated that the State agency made 4,217,888 payments totaling $230,375,748 (Federal share) on behalf of ineligible beneficiaries. We also estimated that case file documentation did not adequately support eligibility determinations for an additional 15,289,843 payments totaling $2,820,569,979 (Federal share). We did not recommend recovery primarily because, under Federal laws and regulations, a disallowance of Federal payments for Medicaid eligibility errors can occur only if the errors are detected through a State’s Medicaid eligibility quality control program. We recommended that the State agency use the results of this review to help ensure compliance with Federal and State Medicaid eligibility requirements. Specifically, the State agency should (1) reemphasize to beneficiaries the need to provide accurate and timely information and (2) require its district office employees to verify eligibility information and maintain appropriate documentation in its case files.
The State agency described some actions being taken to help ensure compliance with Federal and State Medicaid eligibility requirements. However, the State agency stated that we had equated the requirement to have “facts” in the file to support an eligibility determination with having independent documents that are not required by CMS. We agree that the State agency does not need to redocument existing eligibility information. However, for some sampled payments, we could not make eligibility determinations based on the information available to us. When we could not locate the necessary records, we categorized the cases as “insufficient evidence to support eligibility determinations,” not as “eligibility errors.”